<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggerheads backs Blair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randall100.f2s.com/2004/11/bloggerheads-backs-blair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randall100.f2s.com/2004/11/bloggerheads-backs-blair/</link>
	<description>Now with added monkeys!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Underblog.co.uk &#187; Backing Backing Blair?</title>
		<link>http://www.randall100.f2s.com/2004/11/bloggerheads-backs-blair/#comment-2390</link>
		<dc:creator>Underblog.co.uk &#187; Backing Backing Blair?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randall100.f2s.com/?p=92#comment-2390</guid>
		<description>[...] A couple of months ago I wrote a post about my disbelief at Tim Ireland&#8217;s plans for bloggerheads to back blair. It later became appare [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A couple of months ago I wrote a post about my disbelief at Tim Ireland&#8217;s plans for bloggerheads to back blair. It later became appare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.randall100.f2s.com/2004/11/bloggerheads-backs-blair/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2004 11:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randall100.f2s.com/?p=92#comment-950</guid>
		<description>Interesting comments, but I believe the next election will be a lot closer than last time. But you never know, let's wait and see. With interest rates a lot higher than most countries and the very heavy tax burden in the UK, anything is possible. Whatever the media tells us, a lot of people are very unhappy right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments, but I believe the next election will be a lot closer than last time. But you never know, let&#8217;s wait and see. With interest rates a lot higher than most countries and the very heavy tax burden in the UK, anything is possible. Whatever the media tells us, a lot of people are very unhappy right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somebody</title>
		<link>http://www.randall100.f2s.com/2004/11/bloggerheads-backs-blair/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randall100.f2s.com/?p=92#comment-608</guid>
		<description>he's got something up his sleeve. He would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he&#8217;s got something up his sleeve. He would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ireland</title>
		<link>http://www.randall100.f2s.com/2004/11/bloggerheads-backs-blair/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ireland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randall100.f2s.com/?p=92#comment-602</guid>
		<description>I meant what I said and I said what I meant. An elephant is faithful, one hundred percent.

:o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant what I said and I said what I meant. An elephant is faithful, one hundred percent.</p>
<p>:o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: underblog</title>
		<link>http://www.randall100.f2s.com/2004/11/bloggerheads-backs-blair/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>underblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randall100.f2s.com/?p=92#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Well, he says he's working on a flash movie that'll have us all supporting the Bliar, despite having been trying to get rid of him for months. Apparently because he wants to work for the labour party to get MPs blogging.

Personally, I'm not sure I believe him now. Notionally backing blair is one thing, but making a flash movie extolling his merits seems to be going a bit far. There's more to this than I first thought. Perhaps I've been taken in by some elaborate publicity stunt...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, he says he&#8217;s working on a flash movie that&#8217;ll have us all supporting the Bliar, despite having been trying to get rid of him for months. Apparently because he wants to work for the labour party to get MPs blogging.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;m not sure I believe him now. Notionally backing blair is one thing, but making a flash movie extolling his merits seems to be going a bit far. There&#8217;s more to this than I first thought. Perhaps I&#8217;ve been taken in by some elaborate publicity stunt&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.randall100.f2s.com/2004/11/bloggerheads-backs-blair/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randall100.f2s.com/?p=92#comment-599</guid>
		<description>Wait. I'm not suire whether the implication is that Tim Ireland is supporting our illiberal and maniacal PM, whether he's now working on a campaign for the Labour Party, or some vague area in between?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait. I&#8217;m not suire whether the implication is that Tim Ireland is supporting our illiberal and maniacal PM, whether he&#8217;s now working on a campaign for the Labour Party, or some vague area in between?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ireland</title>
		<link>http://www.randall100.f2s.com/2004/11/bloggerheads-backs-blair/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ireland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randall100.f2s.com/?p=92#comment-578</guid>
		<description>1. Multiple personalities? That's a common technique, as used against Sandra Gidley and Jody Dunn (by - one might suspect - the same person/people).

2. I understand the surprise and disappointment some people must be feeling... but within a few weeks, I'll have you backing Blair, too. Just you watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Multiple personalities? That&#8217;s a common technique, as used against Sandra Gidley and Jody Dunn (by - one might suspect - the same person/people).</p>
<p>2. I understand the surprise and disappointment some people must be feeling&#8230; but within a few weeks, I&#8217;ll have you backing Blair, too. Just you watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: underblog</title>
		<link>http://www.randall100.f2s.com/2004/11/bloggerheads-backs-blair/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>underblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randall100.f2s.com/?p=92#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Well, it seems manic has his enemies. Or should I say enemy. "Zippy", "Mel" and "Dillion" all have similar opinions and, amazingly, the same IP address! I find it fairly bizarre that someone should try to covertly influence the tone of discussion on a blog as insignificant as this one.
Further comments from the same IP will be deleted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it seems manic has his enemies. Or should I say enemy. &#8220;Zippy&#8221;, &#8220;Mel&#8221; and &#8220;Dillion&#8221; all have similar opinions and, amazingly, the same IP address! I find it fairly bizarre that someone should try to covertly influence the tone of discussion on a blog as insignificant as this one.<br />
Further comments from the same IP will be deleted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
